PET MPI v. SPECT
|Characteristics of SPECT vs. PET MPI|
|Attenuation correction||Accurate||Less accurate|
|Spatial resolution||5–7 mm||12–15 mm|
|Protocol||< 1 hour||2 days|
|Radiation||< 10 mSv||> 10 mSv|
|Hybrid with CT||Yes||Yes|
– Bateman, TM. Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography and the Role of Adenosine Pharmacalogic Stress. American Journal of Cardiology. 2004; 94:19-24.
– Bateman, TM, Heller, GV, McGhie, IA, et. al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Rest/Stress ECG-gated Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m Sestamibi SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 2006;13:24-33.
– Chow BJ, Wong JW, Yoshinaga K, et. al. Prognostic Significance of Dipyridamole-Induced ST Depression in Patients with Normal 82Rb PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1095-1101.
– Dilsizian, V. Atlas of Nuclear Cardiology. 2003.
– Gould, KL. Reversal of Coronary Atherosclerosis: Clinical Promise as the Basis for Non-invasive Management of Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 1994;90:1558-1571.
– Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance
– Merhige ME, Breen WJ, Shelton V, et al. Impact of myocardial perfusion imaging with PET and (82)Rb on downstream invasive procedure utilization, costs, and outcomes in coronary disease management. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1069-1076.
– Yoshinaga, K, Chow, BW, Williams, K, et. al. What is the Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography? JACC. 2006; 48:1029-39.